Student Conduct Procedures
Student Conduct Procedures
Students that are alleged to have violated the Student Code of Conduct will be apprised of the allegations and afforded the opportunity to participate in a conduct meeting. After a determination/decision has been made regarding the alleged violation(s), students may request an appeal so long as they (i) attended their original conduct meeting, (ii) have grounds for an appeal as stated in the Student Conduct Process, and (iii) submit the required documentation. At the end of the appeal, a final decision will be issued. The process is concluded after the final decision is rendered. The Provost or their designee has the authority to immediately address serious violations of the University’s code of conduct.
The Code of Conduct is outlined in this Handbook. Students are responsible for being aware of these standards of conduct. A plea of ignorance is not an acceptable excuse for violating University policy. Students are encouraged to familiarize themselves with these policies.
When an alleged violation of the Code of Conduct occurs, the incident should be reported as soon as possible. Students have the right to contact local police at any point, however students will still be required to go through the college conduct process (if applicable). The University may notify local and federal authorities when a crime is alleged to have been committed, but such notification will not modify the University’s authority to adjudicate the alleged misconduct through its own student conduct system.
Code of Conduct Handbook
1.1 |
The Board of Trustees and President of Manhattanville University have delegated authority to the University Student Conduct System to adjudicate cases alleging violations of the Code of Student Conduct by Manhattanville University students. |
1.2 |
The procedures included herein apply to the resolution of social misconduct and related matters. Academic integrity cases are handled through a separate process administered by Academic Integrity Office. |
1.3 |
Supervision and implementation of the University Student Conduct System is the responsibility of the Provost and/or their designee. |
1.4 |
Manhattanville University is an institution of higher learning where individual growth and development are fostered, excellence is pursued, and the highest standards of integrity are expectedin all areas of life. Manhattanville University is committed to providing an environment where persons are safe, property is secure, individual rights of all persons are respected, and education of the highest quality is achieved. |
1.5 |
The Code of Student Conduct outlines the behavior that is expected of all students at Manhattanville University. Having enrolled at Manhattanville University, all students have entered into an agreement to abide by the rules and regulations set forth in the Code of Student Conduct. Each student is responsible for conforming their conduct to the requirements of this code and applicable federal, state, and local laws. |
1.6 |
Manhattanville University considers student leaders to be those that hold positional offices in organizations (i.e., president, vice president, secretary, treasurer) or those that influence the behaviors and decisions of an organization. |
1.7 |
Manhattanville University considers its Code of Student Conduct as a statement of minimal expectations and seeks to foster a commitment to the highest standards of ethical behavior by the coherent, consistent, and fair manner in which it enforces its rules and regulations. The University views its student conduct process as a learning experience that is intended to result in the growth and understanding of individual responsibilities on the part of all persons. |
1.8 |
Individuals who pursue allegations of student misconduct through the University Student Conduct System are deemed to have accepted the University’s philosophy that any potential sanctions will be designed to address the safety and security of persons and property and to educate students with regard to higher standards of behavior. |
1.9 |
Violations of the Code of Student Conduct will be adjudicated by theUniversity Student Conduct System, which is designed to reflect and to support the educational mission of the institution and ensure the fair and equitable treatment of all individuals and groups charged with or reporting student misconduct. |
1.10 |
Requests for disability accommodations should be made to the Center for Student Accessibility. |
The University encourages all students to govern their own social and intellectual community through the procedures outlined below. By encouraging individuals to govern their community, the University does not absolve the individual from accepting responsibility for their own behavior.
The University adheres to its mission statement to educate ethically and socially responsible leaders for the global world. The University reaffirms its tenet that its community must be respectful of all differences including perceived age, race, creed, color, religion, national origin, immigration or citizenship status, ethnicity, sexual orientation, military status, sex, gender, disability, predisposing genetic characteristics, criminal conviction, marital status, familial status, domestic violence victim status, gender identity, or transgender identity.
The University does affirm the idea of student freedom with the acceptance of full responsibility for individual action and the consequence of such action. The University reserves the right to intercede and require the immediate suspension or withdrawal of a student where that behavior is perceived to constitute a threat to or violate the rights of members of the community or the individual student. Disciplinary authority is vested in the office of Student Affairs and the Provost’s office. In addition, the President and the Provost or their designee can, in the exercise of discretion, immediately dismiss, suspend or discipline a student for serious misconduct.
Responsibilities Within the Larger Community
It should be remembered that Manhattanville has an obligation to uphold the laws of the larger community. While the activities covered by the laws of the larger community and those covered by Manhattanville’s rules may overlap, it is important to note that the community’s laws and Manhattanville’s rules operate independently and do not substitute for each other. Manhattanville may pursue enforcement of its own rules whether or not legal proceedings are underway or in process and may use information from third-party sources, such as law enforcement agencies and the courts, to determine whether University rules have been broken. Conversely, the University makes no attempt to shield members of the Manhattanville community from the law, nor does it intervene in legal proceedings against a member of the community. The University may, in its discretion, invite law enforcement authorities to the campus to conduct police business and investigation anywhere on the campus. Membership in the Manhattanville community does not exempt anyone from local, state, or federal laws, but rather imposes the additional obligation to abide by all of Manhattanville’s regulations.
Reports of any violent felony offenses committed on campus will be immediately referred to the Harrison Police Department by the Director of Campus Security in conjunction with the Dean of Students or Provost.
Romantic and sexual relations between a student and a faculty or staff member, including voluntary and consensual relations, are prohibited.
Violation of the Law and University Discipline
If a student is charged with or commits a criminal act or violation of the law whether on or off campus, the University may institute its own disciplinary proceedings or in its discretion, otherwise discipline, suspend or expel the student. The University may impose sanctions immediately for serious misconduct, because such conduct calls into question the student’s membership in the University community and may adversely affect the abilities of others to pursue their educational goals or the safety of any member of the University. In the case of an off-campus violation of the law, the University may, in its discretion, immediately discipline a student without first conducting its own fact-finding. If the violation of the law occurs on campus, the University may obviously institute its own proceedings against the offender. However, if the misconduct is sufficiently serious and could compromise the health or wellbeing of any student, the Dean of Students, Provost, or President may immediately discipline a student in their exercise of discretion.
Responsibilities and Ethical Standards of the Conduct Process
The disciplinary record of a student or group, the nature or status of any disciplinary situation shall not be discussed or disclosed unless there is an educational need to know. An objective attitude must be maintained throughout the proceedings. Members of any proceedings have an obligation to disqualify themselves from an investigation when they feel that they cannot be impartial in reaching a decision.
The University conduct process is not meant to be a legal process. The following table outlines the major differences between the Legal System and the University Student Conduct process:
Legal System |
University Student Conduct Process |
Prosecutes criminals who violate the law |
Discipline students who violate institutional rules |
Higher standard of proof — “beyond a reasonable doubt” |
Lower standard of proof — “more likely than not.” (Also referred to as the "preponderance of the evidence.") |
“Rules of evidence” often applied in state and federal courts |
“Rules of evidence” do not apply to Student Conduct Meetings or Hearings. The University utilizes "the preponderance of evidence" when reviewing a case; The hearing officer will weigh all evidence — including issues of credibility and relevance — when making a determination |
More severe punishment |
Educational and corrective accountability |
Can imprison people |
Maximum consequence is expulsion |
State and federal laws set minimum standards for the safe and orderly operation of society |
Set standards requiring ethical and moral behavior of students to create and maintain a productive University living and learning community |
Legal system may choose not to prosecute a certain action or behavior |
Campus resolution may proceed before, during or after civil or criminal actions are concluded. Civil and criminal processes do not affect the Student Conduct process. |
Punishment |
Action Plan/Assignments/Sanctions |
"Guilty" or "not guilty" |
"Responsible" or "not responsible" |
"Plaintiff" and "Defendant" |
"Complainant" and "Respondent"
|
3.1 |
This Code of Conduct shall apply to every Manhattanville student, whether matriculated or not, whether taking courses on-campus or off. In aneffort to provide a safe and secure environment and to protect the public order, the University believes it must hold the members of its community accountable for their behavior at alltimes, on and off campus. |
3.2 |
University jurisdiction and discipline is not limited to conduct which occurs on University premises. Conduct which adversely affects the University community or all those communities with which students interact in carrying out educational or professional activities, including but not limited to students pursuing field experiences and other course assignments, practica, internships, student teaching or supervised teaching, teaching under an internship certificate, research, and students attending professional conferences and education events, shall fall under the jurisdiction of this Code. We aim to especially protect those individuals, such as children, who are deserving of special protections. |
3.3 |
The University Student Conduct System has jurisdiction over all alleged violations of the Code of Student Conduct by any student or recognized student organization that may be brought to its attention. Jurisdiction of the University Student Conduct System extends to alleged misconduct that takes place on University owned or controlled property; alleged misconduct that takes place at any University sponsored event; and alleged misconduct that has an impact on the educational mission and well-being of the University community that takes place at any location off campus. |
3.4 |
The University Student Conduct System has jurisdiction over complaints against students alleging sex discrimination including sexual and gender-based harassment, assault, and violence. The Manhattanville University Sexual Misconduct Policy applies to all University programs and activities. The University processes sex discrimination complaints regardless of where the alleged conduct occurs to determine whether the conduct occurred in the context of its educational program or if it had continuing effects on campus or in an off-campus program or activity. |
3.5 |
University student conduct proceedings are administrative in nature and independent of any criminal and/or civil legal proceedings that may be concurrently in process. University student conduct proceedings are intended to enforce the Code of Student Conduct at Manhattanville University although the conduct in question may be simultaneously in violation of federal, state or local laws. The student or University may notify local and federal authorities when a crime is alleged to have been committed, but such notification will not modify the University’s authority to adjudicate the alleged misconduct through its own student conduct system. |
4.1 |
Conduct Officer: The Conduct Officers are Manhattanville professional staff members as designated by the Provost who act as conduct officers in reaching resolution of student conduct complaints. The Conduct Officer investigates allegations of individual student and student organization misconduct, then renders a decision from the information gathered. The Conduct Officer investigates allegations of individual student and student organization misconduct, then renders a decision from the information gathered. |
4.2 |
The Complainant: The reporting individual or University office which files a complaint that proceeds to a formal conduct process is the “complainant”. The student or student organization against whom the complaint is filed is the “respondent”. |
4.3 |
The Respondent: A student who is alleged to have violated the Student Conduct Code. |
4.4 |
Advisor: Complainants and respondents have the right to have a Manhattanville University employee or student (excluding any relative employed by the University) attend the hearing in the role of advisor. This individual only serves as an advisor and does not actively participate in the hearing. This individual may not address the conduct officer, but may consult with the complainant/respondent. Legal counsel/attorneys, parents/guardians and/or family members, students involved in the incident are not permitted to participate in the meeting. |
4.5 |
Witness: Witnesses are anyone with relevant information about an incident and can participant in-person, remotely or via a statement. |
5.1 |
The status of a respondent will not be changed while a case is pending, unless the Provost, or a designee, determines that an interim suspension or other measures are required to promote the safety and well-being of the University community. Interim suspension limits a student’s ability to be physically present on University property, participate in classes, and/or participate in University activities. |
5.2 |
The Provost or a designee may provisionally suspend a student to protect the safety, security, or well-being of all members of the University community. Absent extenuating circumstances, within two (2) business days, a student will be notified of tentative student conduct charges. Tentative charges are subject to change depending on the information gathered during an investigation. If tentative charges are filed, all efforts will be made to investigate the incident further and proceed with the student conduct process in a timely fashion. |
5.3 |
A student who is suspended on an interim basis will be given the opportunity to be heard by the University Conduct System. Such a request must be made by the student within two (2) University business days of the imposition of the interim suspension. The Conduct Officer will hear the case on the merits of the decision to impose the interim suspension within two (2) University business days of receipt of the student’s written request for a hearing. The decision will be confirmed within two (2) days of the hearing. If no such request is made, the interim suspension will remain in effect pending a hearing meeting on the merits of the conduct case, or until the safety or security concern is resolved. |
5.4 |
Where an interim suspension is imposed in a case involving the arrest of the respondent, the University may require the associated criminal matter to be resolved in full prior to the pending conduct case being heard on its merits. In cases of sexual misconduct, the University may be required to proceed with the conduct case prior to resolution of an associated criminal matter. |
5.5 |
In certain circumstances, a No Contact Directive may be issued by the Provost, designee, or the Title IX Officer, as a directive to prohibit communication to, or among, designated students when there is reason to believe that continued contact is not in the best interest of the involved students to promote their safety and security, or to prevent future negative interactions between the students. |
5.6 |
No Contact Directives prohibit all forms of contact including, but not limited to, contact via social media, contact via a third party and/or in person contact. In certain circumstances, as indicated on the No Contact Directive, a student who receives a No Contact Directive that is issued understands that it remains the student’s responsibility to remove themselves from the situation as quickly as possible under the circumstances. |
5.7 |
If a No Contact Directive is issued, both parties will receive an emailed copy of the Contract and both parties are expected not to have contact with one another. |
5.8 |
No Contact Orders will be reviewed by the Conduct Officer or a designee, to determine if there is a need to continue the contract after the investigation or remove the contract. Both parties will be notified in writing of the decision of the Conduct Officer, or the designee. |
5.9 |
Violations of No Contact Directive by the student to whom it is actionable under the Manhattanville University Student Code of Conduct and will be considered a disciplinary offense and may result in suspension from the University. |
5.10 |
No Contact Directive may be removed or amended by the Provost or the designating conduct officer. If either involved student wants the Contract to be removed, a written request to have the No Contact Directive removed should be sent to the Provost or designee. Manhattanville University is not responsible for negative behaviors that may result from removal of the No Contact Directive if the individual requesting the removal of the No Contact Directive is the person who requested its issuance. The letter must include: |
|
|
|
No Contact Directive will not be considered for removal if all elements of the written request are not addressed, or if there is evidence of the potential for future negative incidents between listed parties or the other party does not want the No Contact Directive removed. |
5.11 |
No Contact Directives are a part of a student’s conduct file. |
6.1 |
A complaint may be filed against any student or recognized student organization by any member of the University community. Complaints may be filed by a student, faculty member, or staff member by filling out a standard Incident Reporting form. The Provost is available for consultation prior to submitting a complaint. A non-University member may file a report with the Department of Campus Safety. A report by a non-University member may be adjudicated if the interests of the University community are sufficiently implicated. All documentation and other information associated with the complaint, e.g., Department of Campus Safety or police reports and witness statements, should be included with the standard incident report form and submitted to the Dean of Students office. |
6.2 |
Once a report is received, the Conduct Officer will determine whether a complaint concerns students and/ or recognized student organizations and whether the complaint concerns subject matter falling within the jurisdiction of the University Student Conduct System. The Conduct Officer further will determine whether the complaint demonstrates sufficient information to warrant further investigation and/or commencement of the student conduct process. The Conduct Officer reviews all filed complaints and identifies charges based on the information presented in the complaint. |
6.3 |
The standard of proof applied within the University Student Conduct System is a preponderance of the evidence, which requires a demonstration that it is “more likely than not” that the respondent has violated the Code of Student Conduct. |
6.4 |
Some allegations of student misconduct require investigation prior to determining whether further student conduct proceedings are warranted. As appropriate, the University will conduct an investigation concerning the allegations. The investigation may be conducted by the Student Conduct Officer, the Department of Campus Safety or another appropriate University office or representative. In cases involving alleged criminal conduct, the Department of Campus Safety can assist a complainant in making a criminal complaint. A complainant need not pursue a criminal complaint in order to seek to hold the accused responsible through the University’s Student Conduct System. |
6.5 |
The University Student Conduct System is confidential and closed to persons not directly related to the case. All parties involved in the University Conduct System are expected to maintain the confidentiality of the process and proceedings. The University reserves the right to correct any misinformation with regard to University Student Conduct System actions that may be circulated in the media when the well-being of the community so requires. |
Complainants and respondents have the right to have a Manhattanville University employee or student (excluding any relative employed by the University) attend the hearing in the role of advisor. This individual only serves as an advisor and does not actively participate in the hearing. This individual may not address the conduct officer, but may consult with the complainant/respondent. Legal counsel/attorneys, parents/guardians and/or family members, students involved in the incident are not permitted to participate in the meeting.
8.1 |
Upon determining that the complaint/incident is appropriate, the Conduct Officer will contact the student or student organization for a conduct meeting. If a student or student organization does not attend the conduct meeting without prior notice to the Conduct Officer, a decision may be rendered in the student’s or organization’s absence. Complainants do not attend hearing meetings with the respondents. |
|
8.2 |
If needed, the Respondent(s) has 48 hours from when the letter is sent by the Conduct Officer to re-schedule a conduct meeting with the Conduct Officer. Failure to re-schedule and/or attend the hearing without prior consent from the Conduct Officer will result in: |
|
|
7.2.1. |
The forfeiture of the student ability to present information on their behalf. |
|
7.2.2. |
Sanctions being issued to the student without the benefit of their input. |
8.3 |
The Respondent has a right to know the nature of the incident at the time of the hearing and provide any information and/or witness statements for the Conduct Officer to review. |
|
8.4 |
Recording devices (audio and/or video) of any kind are not permitted for use during hearing meetings. |
9.1 |
This conduct meeting will take place in a timely manner, usually within two weeks after the complaint/incident is received. Each party will be given written notice of the charges, the procedural rights of a student, and the date, time, and location of the hearing meeting.The hearing notice will be emailed at least three (3) business days prior to the scheduled conduct meeting. |
|
9.2 |
The Conduct Officer will share the charges/violations with the individual and ask questions or clarification of the information provided. |
|
9.3 |
The parties will be able to provide their encounter of the incident and provide names of witnesses to the Conduct Officer. The Conduct Officer will have the discretion to allow or exclude witnesses proposed by either party when the information offered by a witness would be cumulative or irrelevant, or the witness would unnecessarily compromise the confidentiality of the hearing. |
|
|
8.3.1. |
All parties must act in a manner that is respectful of the proceedings and the rights of all individuals involved. It is the responsibility of each party to assure their advisor and witnesses act in a respectful manner. |
|
8.3.2. |
At the conclusion of the hearing meeting, the Conduct Officer will discuss with the parties the possible outcome and sanction(s). |
9.4 |
Each party will receive written notice of the confirmed decision within five (5) business days after the conduct meeting. If a decision cannot be made within five (5) business days after the hearing meeting, the Conduct Officer will reach out to the parties involved to inform of the delay. Sanctions may become effective immediately, even while an appeal is pending, where the facts and circumstances warrant. The timing of any sanctions will be specified in the written notice of the decision. Appeals from decisions of the Conduct Officer must meet the criteria set forth in Part 10 are heard by the Dean of Students or the Provost. |
10.1 |
The primary goal of the University Student Conduct System is education. In addition to educational sanctions, the college may issue sanctions that affect a student or student organization’s status at the college. All sanctions are official actions of the University. Failure to comply with sanctions or with specific conditions related to the safety and security of any persons or property while a case is pending, may result in immediate, suspension or expulsion from the University without benefit of further process. |
10.2 |
The following sanctions, or any combination thereof, may be applied to any individual student, group of students,or student organization, for violations of the Code of Student Conduct and related University policies. |
|
|
10.3 |
NOTIFICATIONS |
|
• arson
Students who have requests or questions should contact the Office of the Dean of Students. All information provided by the Dean of Students will be given verbally and directly to the complainant. Information will not be provided to another person, even at the complainant’s direction or request. |
The purpose and structure of the conduct system is rooted in the personal development of the student. The policies set forth by the college are standards we expect all students to uphold. When a student violates a policy the goal of the conduct process is to 1) hold the student accountable for their actions and 2) help educate the student so further incident do not occur. Multiple policy violations may increase the sanction given. Furthermore, the Dean of Students or designee may increase the standard sanction if deemed necessary.
Below are guidelines of the possible sanctions for each violation, however, each case will be handled on a case-by-case basis.
CATEGORY |
FIRST VIOLATION |
SECOND VIOLATION |
THIRD VIOLATION |
Alcohol – Consumption/Possession |
|
|
|
|
Hearing Officer: RD |
Hearing Officer: RD |
Hearing Officer: ADRL/DRL |
Alcohol – Drinking Games |
|
|
|
|
Hearing Officer: RD |
Hearing Officer: RD |
Hearing Officer: ADRL/DRL |
Alcohol – Hospitalization |
|
|
|
|
Hearing Officer: RD |
Hearing Officer: RD |
Hearing Officer: ADRL/DRL |
Alcohol – Public Intoxication |
|
|
|
|
Hearing Officer: RD |
Hearing Officer: RD |
Hearing Officer: ADRL/DRL |
Alcohol – Underage Distribution |
|
|
|
|
Hearing Officer: DRL |
Hearing Officer: DOS |
|
Amnesty Policy |
|
|
|
Hearing Officer: RD | Hearing Officer: ADRL/DRL | Hearing Officer: DRL/DOS | |
Prohibited Items |
Hearing Officer: RD |
Hearing Officer: RD |
Hearing Officer: ADRL/DRL |
Climbing on Structure |
|
|
|
|
Hearing Officer: RD |
Hearing Officer: RD |
Hearing Officer: ADRL/DR |
Decoration |
|
|
|
|
Hearing Officer: RD |
Hearing Officer: RD |
Hearing Officer: ADRL/DRL |
Dishonesty |
|
|
|
|
Hearing Officer: RD |
Hearing Officer: ADRL/DRL |
Hearing Officer: DOS |
Disorderly Conduct/Disruptive Behavior |
|
|
|
|
Hearing Officer: RD |
Hearing Officer: RD |
Hearing Officer: ADRL/DRL |
Door Propping |
|
|
|
|
Hearing Officer: RD |
Hearing Officer: RD |
Hearing Officer: ADRL/DRL |
Electronic Policy Use |
|
|
|
|
Hearing Officer: ADRL |
Hearing Officer: DRL |
Hearing Officer: DOS |
Failure to Comply |
|
|
|
|
Hearing Officer: RD |
Hearing Officer: RD |
Hearing Officer: ADRL/DRL |
Failure to Evacuate |
|
|
|
|
Hearing Officer: RD |
Hearing Officer: RD |
Hearing Officer: ADRL/DRL |
Failure to Report |
|
|
|
|
Hearing Officer: RD |
Hearing Officer: ADRL/DRL |
Hearing Officer: DRL |
False & Malicious Charges |
|
|
|
|
Hearing Officer: RD |
Hearing Officer: DRL |
Hearing Officer: DOS |
Fire |
|
||
|
Hearing Officer: DRL/DOS |
|
|
False Fire Alarm Activation |
|
|
|
|
Hearing Officer: ADRL |
Hearing Officer: DRL |
Hearing Officer: DOS |
Gambling |
|
|
|
|
Hearing Officer: RD |
Hearing Officer: ADRL/DRL |
Hearing Officer: DOS |
Guest/Visitor |
|
|
|
|
Hearing Officer: RD |
Hearing Officer: RD |
Hearing Officer: DRL |
Harassment |
|
|
|
|
Hearing Officer: ADRL/DRL |
Hearing Officer: DOS |
|
Hate Crime |
|
|
|
|
Hearing Officer: DOS |
Hearing Officer: DOS |
|
Hazing |
|
|
|
|
Hearing Officer: DOS |
Hearing Officer: DOS |
|
Housing Policy Violation |
|
|
|
|
Hearing Officer: RD |
Hearing Officer: RD |
Hearing Officer: ADRL/DRL |
ID Card |
Hearing Officer: RD |
Hearing Officer: RD |
Hearing Officer: ADRL/DR |
Illegal Drugs – Distribution |
|
|
|
|
Hearing Officer: DRL/DOS |
Hearing Officer: DOS |
|
Illegal Drugs – Drug Paraphernalia |
|
|
|
|
Hearing Officer: RD |
Hearing Officer: ADRL/DRL |
Hearing Officer: DOS |
Illegal Drugs - Possession |
|
|
|
|
Hearing Officer: RD |
Hearing Officer: ADRL/DRL |
Hearing Officer: DOS |
Noise |
|
|
|
|
Hearing Officer: RD |
Hearing Officer: RD |
Hearing Officer: ADRL |
Pets |
|
|
|
|
Hearing Officer: RD |
Hearing Officer: RD |
Hearing Officer: ADRL/DRL |
Physical Assault |
|
|
|
|
Hearing Officer: ADRL/DRL/ DOS |
Hearing Officer: ADRL/DRL/ DOS |
Hearing Officer: ADRL/DRL/ DOS |
Reckless Endangerment |
|
|
|
|
Hearing Officer: RD |
Hearing Officer: ADRL/DRL |
Hearing Officer: ADRL/DRL |
Room Capacity |
|
|
|
|
Hearing Officer: RD |
Hearing Officer: RD |
Hearing Officer: ADRL/DRL |
Sexual Assault |
Hearing Officer: Title IX |
Hearing Officer: Title IX |
|
Sexual Harassment |
Hearing Officer: Title IX |
Hearing Officer: Title IX |
|
Sexual Misconduct |
Hearing Officer: Title IX |
Hearing Officer: Title IX |
|
Smoking – In the Residence Halls |
|
|
|
|
Hearing Officer: RD |
Hearing Officer: RD |
Hearing Officer: ADRL/DRL |
Smoking – Outside |
|
|
|
|
Hearing Officer: RD |
Hearing Officer: RD |
Hearing Officer: ADRL/DRL |
Theft |
|
|
|
|
Hearing Officer: ADRL/DRL |
Hearing Officer: DRL/ DOS |
Hearing Officer: DOS |
Threatening or Intimidating Behavior |
|
|
|
Hearing Officer: ADRL/DRL/ DOS | Hearing Officer: ADRL/DRL/ DOS | Hearing Officer: ADRL/DRL/ DOS | |
Unauthorized Entry |
|
|
|
|
Hearing Officer: RD |
Hearing Officer: RD |
Hearing Officer: DRL |
Vandalism |
|
|
|
|
Hearing Officer: RD |
Hearing Officer: ADRL/DRL |
Hearing Officer: DRL/DOS |
Violations of Criminal Law |
|
||
|
Hearing Officer: DOS |
|
|
Weapons and Dangerous Objects |
|
||
|
Hearing Officer: DOS |
|
|
12.1 |
A student has 48 hours from receipt of the letter to appeal the decision to the appeal officer in writing. Appeals must be submitted by the student, not a parent/guardian, friend, family member, or legal counsel/attorney. The following are grounds for an appeal:
|
12.2 |
A student has 48 hours from receipt of the letter to appeal the decision to the appropriate appeal officer below in writing.
|
|
Once an appeal is submitted the appeals officer will determine if a face to face meeting is warranted. Appellate decisions are final and not appealable and will be rendered after receiving the appeal. Failure to schedule and/or attend the hearing without prior consent from the Conduct Officer will result in:
|
12.3 |
On appeal, sanctions can be increased or decreased. If an appeal is heard, the following actions may be taken:
|
13.1 |
Access to disciplinary records is provided in accordance with the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974, as amended. Except in unusual circumstances as determined in its sole discretion, and consistent with federal law, Manhattanville University will seek to notify parents or guardians of conduct issues involving dependent students as follows:
|
13.2 |
Disciplinary records are retained for seven (7) years from the date of the most recent incident in the student’s file or until one (1) year after the student has graduated from the University, whichever is longer. Records of students who were suspended, expelled, prohibited from future enrollment or otherwise withdrawn for disciplinary reasons are retained indefinitely. Students are advised to consult the Academic Integrity Office with regard to the records retention policies associated with academic dishonesty cases. |
14.1 |
The University reserves the right to place a hold on a respondent student’s academic records until an investigation and conduct case (if any) is resolved. The hold may prevent the student from registering from classes or obtaining a copy of their academic transcript. Absent special circumstances, students may not withdraw from the University while an investigation or conductcase is pending. A student who attempts to withdraw from the University rather than participate in the conduct process may be classified as having been withdrawn for disciplinary reasons. This status will be noted on the student’s transcript. |